Our 2022 Call for Speakers (CfS) is now open via WeReview (our submission and review platform).

Please read all our "Information for Submitters" below, before making a submission

Timeline

  • The CfS will close: Friday 7 January 2022 at 11:59pm (GMT)*
  • Our review process will take approximately 3 weeks
  • We aim to inform submitters if they have been accepted by Friday 4 February

(*if you are a new speaker and would like an extension and/or mentorship please contact us as soon as possible to discuss further)

Information for submitters

We recommend all submitters read the guidance below, especially if this is your first time submitting a session to one of our conferences. The Submitter Information is full of helpful details to get you started. It contains advice on the kind of sessions we look for, as well as information on our review process and speaker terms. 

If you need to contact us about your session proposal, you are welcome to do so via the details on our contact page

The 3rd online Lean Agile Exchange brings together practitioners from Europe, North America and beyond for 2 days of practical sessions exploring cutting-edge themes.

We are looking for a mixture of inspiring speakers, tutorials, engaging live sessions, interactive sessions, speaker discussions, fishbowls with Q&A. Participants should be encouraged to tackle new, challenging ideas, and share their knowledge with others.

Please note: We will be updating this section with conference themes in the next week.

Session Types

We're happy for you to present a session about your experiences or something you've done, but we also strongly encourage interactive sessions that generate conversation with the audience, group discussion or hands-on experiences.

Case Study

A presentation and discussion of real-life (not theoretical) experiences of the application (or mis-application) of relevant techniques. Case studies include some discussion of lessons learned and an indication of how novel the work is.

Talk

A presentation & discussion of a specific topic or issue. Talks should include sharing of real-life examples and experiences.

Workshop

A (virtual) hands-on working session focused around a specific topic, tool, technique or issue. Primarily led by the speaker, workshops usually include some elements of interactivity or individual/group exercises. These are usually best suited to a “Zoom meeting” format. Please indicate if you need to cap numbers.

Discussion

A more informal session e.g goldfish bowl, lean coffee or something else that allows the participants to bring thoughts, ideas, questions and problems on a topic that you facilitate. Be sure to indicate which type of discussion you propose when submitting and if you need to cap numbers.

Live or Pre-recorded

Delivery of your session can be made in one of the following ways:

Live: Livestream on the day (via Zoom Webinar or Meeting) - please note you’ll need to be available at least 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start of your session.

Pre-recorded: You will need to pre-record your session and be present to stream the recording on the day (via Zoom). This will enable you to welcome the participants and take live questions throughout the session. If you choose this option and wish to take questions please allow enough time in your session duration for the live parts of your session. Please note you’ll need to be available at least 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start of your session - if you want to provide a pre-recorded session without the live element please include that in "anything else" during your submission.

We encourage all speakers to participate for the full conference but understand if this is not possible

Delivery

All sessions will be run via, and (if permitted) recorded in, zoom. You do not need to be an expert in running zoom, we schedule all sessions from our account with a 30 minute practice ahead of your programme start time, and we provide an event team host from the start of your practice time to the end of your session.

Zoom Meeting or Webinar?

  • We generally schedule Keynotes/Case Study/talks in Zoom Webinar
  • Workshops/Discussions and interactive sessions in Zoom Meeting
  • However, this is flexible so just let us know your preference

Zoom Webinars

  • Are more like giving a lecture in a lecture hall - you will be a "panelist" and can see participant names and they can post questions to you - you will not be able to see or hear them on camera unless they are promoted to being a panelist

Zoom Meetings

  • Are more like giving a tutorial in a classroom
  • You can see the video/sound of all participants if they are unmuted
  • Meetings give you greater flexibility to include interactive content
  • You can use breakout rooms in zoom meetings - please note breakout rooms cannot be recorded and captions cannot (currently) be enabled

Speaker support

Tickets

We have a limited number of free speaker tickets available for our events - as we have to cover speaker costs with the income from tickets. We allocate these tickets in relation to session duration as below.

  • For 30 minute sessions, only the first named speaker pays no conference fees. Additional speakers must purchase a special low cost ticket.
  • For 45 or 60 minute sessions, only the first two named speaker pays no conference fees. Additional speakers must purchase a special low cost ticket.
  • For 90 or 120 minute sessions, only the first three named speakers will pay no conference fees. Additional speakers must purchase a special low cost ticket.

If you would like more detail or have any specific requests, please contact us

Expenses

In appreciation of your time, we offer a one time expense of £100 (GBP) per session (not per speaker). Please indicate on the submission form, if you would like to take this expense.

Unfortunately, we cannot accept requests for additional financial support after you have agreed that amount and we cannot pay expenses that we haven’t agreed to pay in advance of the event.

We want to support all our speakers, so please let us know if you require more information.

Speaker Terms

Session reviews

After the deadline closes, our selection panel will review all submissions anonymously. The review process usually takes between 2 - 4 weeks depending on the volume of submissions. We’ll contact both successful and unsuccessful candidates within the review period.

Data policy

We need to hold information you provide on computer databases for administrative purposes. Summary information, which could include contact data, will be published for all session leaders.

Information about participants will be made available to organisations involved in administering, organising or supporting the event and this may include organisations outside the EC.

General

The organisers are not responsible for the views or opinions expressed by speakers, sponsors or other participants.

Programming

Inclusion of a session in the programme will be at the sole discretion of the conference organisers. By agreeing to have your session included in the programme you agree to participate in the conference and in all pre-conference quality control activities as deemed necessary by the conference organisers. You also agree to promote your session and involvement in the build up to the event. We will provide a range of assets to support any promotional efforts.

The organisers reserve the right to remove a session from the programme at any time. Speakers will no longer be eligible for free entry to the conference and so will have to pay the current non-speaker rate if they wish to participate in the conference.

The organisers will not be responsible for payment of any kind on behalf of the speaker in this event.

Tips for Submitting a proposal

The programme comprises a few invited speakers and a majority of folk who apply through the Call for Speakers (CfS).

After the CfS closing date our programme panel anonymously review and comment on submissions - we then take these reviews to our programme meeting with the aim of creating a full programme.

We generally have more quality submissions than spaces, and some tough choices need to be made. During the programme meeting panel reviews are considered, along with the conference themes, and logistics. Selection is about more than just the topic - we like to help develop speakers, and provide a platform for a range of backgrounds, experiences and perspectives. After considerable iteration and occasional agreement, the programme emerges.

The first step to speaking is submitting a proposal - this is essentially a pitch promoting the content and speaker.

Without knowing your name or reputation we need to get a clear picture of what your session offers to the audience, and why you are confident you can deliver that offer.

The key areas for the submission are as follows:

Title

A good title is important, those crucial first impressions form in seconds. Generally engaging and expressive titles work well. The expressive element makes it clear what the talk is about, its focus or subject area. The engaging element draws attention.

  • Expressive: "A workshop with exercises to explain the differences between mentoring and coaching."
  • Engaging (perhaps!): "You are invited to an Interactive Holistic Detective Workshop."
  • A blend: "Introducing The Holistic Detective Game - exploring the relationship between mentoring and coaching."
  • There are of course many other ways to achieve this balance, keep it authentic and find your own style.

 

 

Short Summary

We generally use your abstract as your session description on our website, it also appears just before people choose to join a session live. 

A good description is engaging and informative. It is both an attractor and a filter, telling people what to expect so they can make a decision. The programme is packed with good stuff, there are difficult choices, so an honest description is the best kind. It's not about packing a (virtual) room with false promises. It may be better to have a room of 20 people who are all content with their decision, than a room of 50+ where most feel the talk is not what they expected.

Tip: If you don't want to augment your 'Session Description - in full'  leave the summary blank. When reviewing proposals it's completely frustrating trying to sift two blocks of text and determine if there is any difference between them.

Session description - in full

This is an opportunity to provide more detail to the panel. The information is not usually shared with participants - however, please note, we may edit some of your fuller description into your summary (especially if it is very short) to help participants - for example, we often use "Participant Takeaways' in your session description online.

Provide all details you feel are relevant. These will be used during the selection process. Descriptions with more detail are generally rated higher by the review panel.

We strongly recommend you include 3-5 takeaways for participants. If the session is pitched to a specific level e.g Beginner or Advanced, you should also make that clear.

Workshop descriptions often deserve more attention - as most are longer than a talk, representing a greater investment for the participants, and as there are often fewer places for workshops in the schedule a greater risk for the panel. The panel need to be sure of what will be delivered, and confident it will be delivered well. It often helps to provide a more detailed agenda and breakdown of learning outcomes.

It's also worth mentioning: Has the talk been given before? Is it an iteration on one you presented at the conference previously? Is there flexibility on duration? Is it interactive? - especially if it is listed as a talk/case study - some participants prefer not to join interactive sessions and choose talks as they do not expect to have to be actively participating.

How not to get accepted

While we don't necessarily know what we're looking for, and love to be surprised, we can be more sure of a few things we don't want:

Links - including links in your summary and/or description that our reviewers need to follow and/or watch, instead of writing a description - this removes your anonymity and our reviewers will not click on them.

A hard sell - The focus should be firmly on value to the audience. It's fine to mention great things about your organisation, your skills, service or product. That context is valuable but don't overdo it.

Too brief - We need enough information to make a decision, and determine if the session will be of value to the audience. Participants will also need that information to decide if the session is for them.

I'm a rockstar - You may have an awesome reputation, but we need to know what you are offering the audience this time.

Been there done that - We like to include introductory material, there will definitely be people just starting out and a few who would appreciate a reminder. Experienced practitioners are in the majority though, so detailed descriptions of easily accessible, well-covered information are unlikely to make it.

Rants - Please, don't just bring a rant. If you're analysing methods tell us what happened, what you learned, a reflective style works well here: What? So what? Now what?

Be rude or be a Zebra (Zero Evidence But Really Arrogant) - We welcome alternative views and ideas, but in doing so be respectful, and be well informed. There is a world of difference between 'The holistic detective method is rubbish' and 'We tried the method, it had these impacts, these were our conclusions'.

Type of Session

From the audience perspective, talk types are categorised by interaction style and degree of knowledge transfer. At one end of the spectrum, case studies and tutorials invite an audience to listen and knowledge is offered almost exclusively from the speaker. At the other end, during an interactive discussion, participants are listening, talking and knowledge flows between participants and the facilitator.

When making a submission the key thing is to be clear about your style.

In summary...

Lean Agile Exchange aims to be a safe place to learn and grow your skills, a goal it's delivered against for the past two years. The majority of our speakers are chosen through the CfS and I hope this post has provided a better idea of what we're aiming for and how the process works. I'd be interested in your feedback, if you have questions, suggestions, rants or raves, don't hesitate to get in touch.

Providing the topic relates to our key themes, we welcome submissions from any industry, role, background and experience level. This includes first time speakers, and mentoring may be available.

We want to hear your story, the first step to telling it is here.

    LAx previously attracted people with the following roles

    • Analyst
    • Architects
    • C-Level/Director/ Founder
    • Coaches
    • Consultants/Freelancers
    • Data Strategy
    • Designers
    • Developers/Engineers
    • Digital or Engineering or Product or Service Directors and Managers
    • HR/People Development
    • Job seeker
    • Lead
    • Manager/Head of
    • Product Manager/Owner
    • Programme and Project Manager
    • Quality Assurance or Tester
    • Scrum Master/Delivery Manager